Toho Tells Comcast, "Didn't You Learn From Subway? You Can't Use Godzilla To Sell Cable TV!"
Written By: Ken Hulsey
Source: Advertising Age
Many of you may remember back to April of 2008, when Toho studios sued the sandwich chain, Subway, for using a dinosaur that vaguely looked like their iconic movie monster, "Godzilla". Well apparently the cable television provider, Comcast, either missed, or forgot about, that one, because they themselves are now being sued by the Japanese movie studio for actually using Godzilla in a television commercial.
The ad in question features a giant monster, which is unmistakably "Godzilla", fighting a giant robot in an animated sequence. The appearance is sort of brief, quickly showing the monster in combat against the robot in a fictional world dubbed "Comcast Town", then the fight is seen again on a television screen in an apartment.
Now, when it comes to the "Subway" advertisement, there could be some doubt on whether the monster in the commercial is actually "Godzilla", honestly it appears to be nothing more than a giant green T-Rex, but in this case no one could argue that the big green monster here isn't actually Toho's pride and joy, and their lawyers agree.
Charles N. Shephard, lawyer for Toho and partner at Los Angeles law firm Greenberg Glusker, explains, "Take any major iconic, copyrighted fictional character, whether it be Mickey Mouse or Darth Vader. If you are going to use those figures as the centerpiece of a national advertising campaign, you have to pay the dollars to do so."
And how much would such an appearance cost?
"Reasonable value of what [Comcast and Goodby] have taken," an amount Shephard estimates at "certainly in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not more."
So far Goodby Silverstein & Partners (the ad agency who produced the commercial) and Comcast representatives have remained hush about the suite, only making the brief statement, "Comcast does not believe there has been any copyright infringement."
Despite their obvious belief to the contrary, it appears to me that the cable TV giant may have to pay up for this one. I don't think anybody would back them in their claim, that the monster in the ad in question could be anything else but "Godzilla."
According to the law suite, Toho first learned of the commercial back in March when it first aired, at that time they sent a cease-and-desist letter to Comcast, who, at the time, agreed to pull the ad. According to Mr. Shephard, the ads continued to air for months.
"We found out about the advertising campaign in March and asked them immediately to stop running it. Eventually they did stop running it, but it took them quite a while to do so. We're not dealing with unsophisticated companies here. We've got a major advertiser in Comcast and a major ad agency in Goodby, and they should not have done it."
See Also: Toho Sues Subway Over Monster Sandwich Add
Peter H. Brothers' Ishiro Honda Bio To Be Published / G-FAN No. 88 Summary / Schedule Conflict Knocks Out Godzilla Film Fest / G-FEST XVI News / Preserving Godzilla And The Blu-Ray Announcement / Godzilla 3D - Opinions Swirling Swirling Swirling / Godzilla 3D Begins Pre-Production For 2011 Release / A Pin-up Girl Riding Godzilla - Now This Is Art! / Godzilla & The Monsters Of Mass Destruction Trailer / Steve Bissette Creates Special Artwork For New Hampshire Screening Of King Kong vs Godzilla / G-FAN #87 Summary / Ishiro Honda Bio Being Negotiated / Robert Scott Field Is Joining Kenji Sahara At G-FEST XVI / King Kong And Godzilla Invade The London Subway / King Kong vs Godzilla (1962)(Toho) / G-FEST XVI To Host Kenji Sahara / Photo Of The Week - Godzilla Goes On A Date / New Wooden Godzilla Figures Cost More Than Most Cars / Rare Video - Haruo Nakajima Puts On The Godzilla Suite One Last Time For Magazine Shoot / Toho Is Renting Out Godzilla And MechaGodzilla Movie Costumes / Yumiko Shaku Looks For love At The Blood Bank / Godzilla To Add His Fire To Hot Atlanta / Godzilla Vs The Netherlands / You Can Do Anything But Lay Off Of My Kaiju Shoes / Haruo "Godzilla" Nakajima Turns 80 /King Kong, Godzilla And The Creature From The Black Lagoon At The Rose Parade
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Written By: Ken Hulsey / Armand Vaquer Sources: Avery Guerra / Daisuke Sato / Robert Hood Just about everyone who reads Monster Island News...
-
The sequences with Ultraman fighting proved to be so expensive to film, that the producers needed a way to limit the scenes to only a few...
-
Unraveling the Web: Why 'Spider-Noir' is the Ultimate Nostalgic Thrill Ride! Written By Ken Hulsey Terri and I have a new show tha...
-
Source: 20th Century Fox JESSICA BIEL has become one of Hollywood's most coveted leading women. Biel was hailed for her performance in f...
-
Written By: Ken Hulsey With all the buzz generated yesterday, when it was announced that Legendary Pictures, in conjunction with Warner B...
-
From Deadline Hollywood Another piece of Captain Marvel casting has fallen into place. Humans star Gemma Chan is set to play Minn-Erva i...
-
Source: Warner Bros UPDATE - Meet Mad Men's Sexy New Starlet! CHRISTINA HENDRICKS can currently be seen as Joan Harris on the fou...
-
Written By: Ken Hulsey This is part 2 of my San Diego Comic Con experience. Like I mentioned in my previous article, my experience at Comic...
-
Source: Entertainment Earth Order Your R2D2 Today! Only $179.99 Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid ...
Hey Ken,
ReplyDeleteToho is right, the monster is unquestionably Godzilla.
I wonder if the producers ever paid Toho to use the Godzilla figure in "Rosanne"?
ReplyDeleteArmand, I don't think that's the same issue. The toy on "Rosanne" was an actual Godzilla figure, made by a company who had paid the license fees to Toho to make the figure. Said figure was never, to the best of my knowledge, anywhere but in the background of several shots and was never a major focus of the show. I think "fair use" covers that.
ReplyDeleteThe difference is, of course, that Godzilla is featured prominently in Comcast's ad (and unlike Subway's ad, it's definitely Godzilla) and is thus being used to sell a product meaning that the company is profiting from the use of a recognized character without offering the creators/owners of said character a dime for the permission to use him.
That's most definitely not "fair use."